Turn messy market insight into account criteria, exclusions, triggers, and message angles.
GTM Cadence
Sharper B2B GTM for founders.
I help founder-led B2B teams work out who to pursue, what to say, what data and tooling they need, and how to run a simple weekly GTM loop.
For founder-led B2B teams where pipeline depends on sharper buyer logic, not more generic volume.
Research, enrich, and structure the account view so the next action is visible.
Use AI assistance for research, processing, drafting, and review without handing off judgment.
Keep weekly decisions tied to real accounts, copy tests, tooling, and follow-up.
What it does
Clarity first. Tools second.
Before adding more activity, the work is to make the commercial logic explicit: who fits, why they care, what proof matters, what data is missing, and what the team can actually run each week.
ICP and exclusions
Define the best-fit accounts, useful exclusions, buying triggers, and the situations worth pursuing.
Offer and message
Turn the value proposition into sharper angles, proof points, objections, and buyer-ready copy.
Account data
Enrich and structure account research so the best opportunities and next actions are visible.
Tooling and cadence
Wire the workflow, CRM views, AI assistance, and weekly review rhythm that keep GTM moving.
The edge
The edge is joining commercial taste with hands-on execution.
This is useful when the GTM problem is not one tactic. It sits between ICP, proposition, copy, account data, tools, and founder judgment.
Reads the buyer
Enough commercial taste to challenge the ICP, buyer pain, category frame, and proof.
Shapes the proposition
Strong enough with copy and positioning to make the offer easier to understand and test.
Builds the data layer
Hands-on enough to clean, enrich, process, and structure target account data into a usable view.
Keeps it operational
Practical enough to wire modern AI and GTM tools without losing the human judgment loop.
How it can start
Start with the bottleneck, not a pre-baked channel.
The shape depends on what is actually unclear: ICP, proposition, account data, tooling, or operating rhythm. The first move should make that visible quickly.
Find the real GTM constraint
Clarify who fits, why now, what claim is believable, and what needs to be tested.
Short passTurn it into a usable system
Set up the account view, data inputs, message structure, and workflow the team can run.
Build projectKeep the learning loop moving
Review accounts, refine copy, maintain data, and decide what to do next each week.
Ongoing loopFit
Best for founders with real market context.
The work is strongest when there is already a real B2B offer and useful founder insight, but the GTM motion is still too scattered, manual, or noisy.
Founder-led or small senior team selling into a clear account universe.
Pure activity without a clear ICP or reason buyers should care.
The offer exists, but account criteria, message, tools, or follow-up are noisy.
One-off tooling work with no commercial GTM outcome attached.
Enough market insight exists to make sharp calls about buyers and angles.
Consumer growth or operations projects without a sales-led market.
Willing to improve the GTM system before adding more activity.
No owner for decisions, follow-up, or learning from the market.
First move
Send the messy context. Make the next move clearer.
Share the company, offer, target buyers, current tools, and where pipeline gets stuck. The first reply should clarify what to work on next, not bury you in a generic GTM plan.